INTRODUCTION
Elections are one very important integral component of any democratic society. Elections not
only allow the people to choose who by they wish to be governed, but equally bring about the
very important concept of social contract where a relationship of master/servant gets to be
created.
As article 5(1)1
of the constitution establishes that the sovereign authority of the republic vests
in the people, and as article 602
establishes that legislative authority derives from the people, it
is imperative that the people without hindrance, are enabled to exercise their sovereign
authority as established in the constitution.
Part V of the constitution is titled ‘REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE’ and article 45 has
‘PRINCIPLES OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS’ as its heading. Clause (2) of
article 45 provides for the process and system of administering elections to, among other,
ensure a simple and practical system of voting and tabulating votes is used.
Key to the electoral systems and process is to have guaranteed representation of the people in
all various sections of society as provided under article 45(1)(c)(d).3 Hence, a system used to
elect Members of Parliament and Councillors becomes very important in meeting the
aspirations of having fair representation of the various interest groups in society and ensuring
gender equity in the National Assembly and Council.
The current First-Past-The-Post electoral system provided under article 47(2)(3)4
is not
designed to yield such desires contained in paragraphs (c) and (d) of clause (1) article 45 of the
constitution. There is therefore indeed a need to reform the electoral system by adopting one
that is able to bring out the desires of the people as contained in the constitution. Indeed a
number of systems exist that would bring about the desired outcomes of fair representation of
the various interest groups in society and ensuring gender equity in the National Assembly and
Councils.
Whatever suggested systems to reform the electoral systems with, must ensure that the core
values of the electoral systems and process, are maintained which is, to ensure
‘REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE’. The system must not only ensure representation of
1 5(1) Sovereign authority vests in the people of Zambia, which may be exercised directly or through elected or
appointed representatives or institutions.
2 Article 60- The legislative authority of the Republic derives from the people of Zambia and shall be
exercised in a manner that protects this Constitution and promotes the democratic governance of the
Republic.)
3 45(1). The electoral systems provided for in Article 47 for the election of President, Member of
Parliament or councillor shall ensure— (c) fair representation of the various interest groups in society;
and (d) gender equity in the National Assembly or council
4 47(2) Elections to the National Assembly shall be conducted under a first-past-the-post electoral
system in accordance with Article 68. (3) Elections to councils shall be conducted under a first-pastthe-post electoral system, and in accordance with Articles 153 and 154.
the people, it must equally be one that would curb against ELECTED DICTATORSHIPS5
in
the country.
The Party-list Proportional Representation electoral system is one ideal system that would
ensure representation of the various interest groups in society, gender equity in the National
Assembly and Councils and at the same time curb against ELECTED DICTATORSHIPS. For
this system however to successfully do that, it may require that a second chamber of Parliament
is established rather than having a single chamber with members elected on the basis of FirstPast-The-Post and others on the basis of Proportionality (MMES).
In line with the need for simplicity and practicability of the system of counting and tabulating
votes, it appears the MMES may present a bit of challenge in terms of simplicity and
practicability. Without pointing to any specific parts of the MMES, just the process of
establishing a Proportional outcome together with the popular votes members within the
chamber, appears not to be a simple and practical system of electing members with a view to
ensuring fair representation of the various interest groups in society and gender equity in the
National Assembly and Councils.
The system in itself is quite clear and simple to attain however the determinant of the mixed
membership is what appears rather ambiguous. Hence, the establishment of a second chamber
would simplify the process based on the same method of determining the proportionality of
representation arising from the number of votes each party receives which would translate
proportionately to the number of seats a political party would be allocated in the second
chamber of Parliament. Hence, the second chamber would not be based on democratic
principles of representation of the people as the members there would not have any
constituency in the sense, but their role would be to ensure fair representation of the various
interest groups in society and also promote gender equity in Parliament and ultimately
safeguarding against ‘ELECTED DICTATORSHIPS’.
COMPOSITION OF PROPOSED SECOND CHAMBER OF PARLIAMENT BASED
ON PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Contrary to the current National Assembly whose composition is based on constituency
representation with a majoritarian system where the candidate with the most votes wins an
election notwithstanding the percentage (FPTP), the second chamber composed on
Proportional Representation principles, will not be based on any constituency representation in
the sense of the country’s demarcated constituencies for purposes of representation to
Parliament. Therefore, though there would not be such constituencies, there would nevertheless
be constituencies based on political parties that would be allocated seats in the second chamber
of Parliament based on the proportion of votes a party receives either at Presidential or
Parliamentary level.
Guided by the legislative provisions, the parties would ensure they nominate from their Partylist, individuals to the second chamber of Parliament based on gender equity and representation
of the various interest groups within society to be the members of the second chamber of
5 Where a political party in government has an overwhelming majority in Parliament to enable the
party pass any political and legislative decisions without much opposition.
Parliament. Therefore, whatever percentage of votes a party receives either at Parliamentary or
Presidential level, would proportionately be the number of seats a party would be allocated in
the second chamber.
SECOND CHAMBER AS A CURB ON ELECTED DICTATORSHIPS
An elected dictatorship is brought about by numbers in a country’s Parliament. Where a party
forming government has such an overwhelming majority of seats in Parliament which
ordinarily is the institution of democracy, the numbers would transform the institution into an
institution of dictatorship as the party with an absolute majority would be able to make
whatever political or legislative decision without any meaningful scrutiny coming from the
opposition. The 1991 elections in Zambia and the 1997 elections in Britain yielded elected
dictatorship where in Zambia for example, the 1996 constitution was adopted and enacted by
a Parliament that was over 70% Movement for Multi-party Democracy (MMD).
Notwithstanding the public outcry against enacting the constitution whose contents had
drastically been changed by the same Parliament at adoption stage, so that its contents ceased
to reflect what the people’s submissions were, but rather reflected the views of the party in
government at the time arising from its majority in Parliament, the constitution was passed and
assented to. Had the Parliament of Zambia been bicameral (two chambers of Parliament), the
likelihood of the 1996 constitution being passed when it was manifestly contrary to the
aspirations of the people in the country, would not have been there since it would have had to
be subjected to further scrutiny in the second chamber whose composition would have been
based on proportionality.
SECOND CHAMBER AS A MEANS TO PROMOTE PLURALISM IN
GOVERNANCE
Besides curbing against elected dictatorships, a second chamber would further enhance
participation of different political parties in the governance of the country where, because they
would have representation in Parliament, whatever ideas they may have which may be good
for the country, would have a platform where they can be articulated and considered for policy
and implementation for the good of the country. A classic example of this is the idea the Green
Party had on legalising cultivation of marijuana for medicinal purposes. Apart from reports in
newspapers, there was no other platform before which those ideas were presented. With a
second chamber based on Proportional Representation, a vital platform would be created for
other political players otherwise note represented in the one chamber constituted based on FirstPast-The-Post system, a system that mainly supports only the bigger political parties and
thereby distorting the political landscape of the country.
OTHER ADVANTAGES OF PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Besides the advantages of Proportional Representation highlighted, the system is equally idea
in avoiding by-elections. Under Proportional Representation, political parties are allocated
seats which seats will belong to the political parties for the duration of the session of
Parliament. Where therefore a vacancy would fall for whatever reason, there would be no need
for a by-election as the political party whose seat has fallen vacant would simply nominate
another from its ranks to fill the vacancy. This however is in the light that the First-Past-ThePost electoral system is completely done away with and replace completely by the Proportional
Representation as the case is in countries like South Africa.
SOME DISADVANTAGES OF PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION SYSTEM
Though the Proportional Representation electoral system is ideal for ensuring fair
representation of the various interest groups in society and gender equity in the National
Assembly, the members do not have that attachment to the electorate and they are not
accountable to them. Accountability is to political parties that nominate them to the chamber.
The party therefore has a lot of influence on the members nominated to the second chamber
which sometimes, may affect the proper judgment of the members on matters of national
importance which the members may be influenced to consider from the political eyes rather
than national interest.
CONCLUSION
As the main objectives for the proposed reforms concern fair representation of the various
interest groups in society and gender equity in the National Assembly and Council, the
disadvantages of Proportional Representation highlighted above may not much adversely affect
the realisation of what the purpose for having a Proportional Representation electoral system
are. Equally, the aspect of ‘REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE’ would not completely be
lost whether the system is brought about through establishment of a second chamber or as
suggested, through the MMES. Where it to be introduced via a MMES, the members elected
on the basis of majority vote drawn from constituencies, would still be part of the Parliament.
Where it to be through a second chamber, representation would still be there via the already
existing chamber whose composition would still be based on First-Past-The-Post system where
the main focus is on representation of the people.
MULENGA BESA
Constitutional Law Lecturer
Lusaka Goldsmiths University